Posts Tagged ‘UC Rusal’

Oleg’s opinion piece

Friday, August 27th, 2010

Here is a piece written by the head of UC Rusal, Oleg Deripaska, which appeared recently in the Wall St Journal.   I would not call this an unbiased view!

China now boasts by some measures the second-largest economy in the world. Undoubtedly, the country today is the ultimate driver in Asia and is a key player in the global economy. And in coming years it will play an even more significant role. So it is understandably tempting to view the country as an unbendable force of nature, especially when it comes to manufacturing, and especially in heavy industries that depend on the ability to mobilize large amounts of capital and large numbers of workers. Yet this image is deceptive. As my own company has found, China presents opportunities for foreigners to supply it in these areas. The key is to find the right ways to take advantage of those opportunities.

Aluminum is a good example of the complexities of China’s industrial economy. The country’s rapid industrialization and urbanization have sparked a consumption boom in aluminum for various industries. Aluminum is a key component in the cables that deliver the Internet to China’s growing number of Web surfers; an average of 130 kilograms of aluminum go into each of the 13.6 million cars that were sold in China last year; aluminum is employed in countless parts of the 8.5 million new residential units that were sold in China in 2009. Today, China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of primary aluminum, representing about one-third of global production of 37.7 million metric tons and consumption of 34.3 million metric tons in 2009. Yet China’s consumption still is lower than in developed economies, at 10.5 kilograms per capita per year, compared to up to 13.1 kilograms per capita in the developed world. China’s consumption is likely to double as the economy grows.

China may struggle to meet this aluminum demand. That might come as a surprise given its reputation in other industries. For instance, the country’s ability to produce large quantities of steel is making itself felt in lower prices around the world. The same is true in electronics and consumer manufactured goods. Aluminum is a different game, however. For one thing, China struggles to power its aluminum industry. On average it takes some 17.4 megawatt-hours of electricity to produce one metric ton of aluminum (compared to only around 5.7 MWh of electricity to smelt one metric ton of steel). That energy intensity is why the world’s smelters tend to be located in areas that have access to abundant power resources (hydroelectric, natural gas, coal or nuclear). Yet China remains heavily dependent on coal to meet its electricity demand. The coal is neither cost-effective nor environmentally friendly.

Production efficiency of aluminum smelters is another key problem. The average production costs of most Chinese producers are around $2,000-2,100 per metric ton of aluminum, whereas the current aluminum prices stand at around $2,260 per metric ton. If that price falls below $2,000 per metric ton, as much as 80% of China’s aluminum production capacity may become unprofitable. At present time about 25% of aluminum production volume in China is unprofitable. Meanwhile, benefiting from access to cheap hydro-power and as a result of cost-saving initiatives, Rusal can produce at a cost of only $1,653 per metric ton (compared to Alcoa’s almost $1,800 per metric ton and to Chalco’s $2,000 per metric ton, according to research company Brook Hunt).

Given the Chinese government’s desire to improve economic efficiency more broadly, and its aim to address environmental concerns, China could eventually put offline all of its least efficient aluminum production, freeing up energy and diverting it to other important state projects and urban consumers. As that happens, many local consumers will have to look abroad for aluminum. This represents great opportunities for global producers. Chinese companies are already struggling to secure a stable supply from domestic producers, and the world’s major industry players are competing for their share of this very lucrative market.

The key will be figuring out how to compete effectively. Rusal stepped into the game relatively recently—just last year—but we already are enjoying a measure of success. Our advantages include a relatively low-cost, renewable and environmentally friendly energy supply and our location only 500 kilometers from the Chinese border—proximity that leads to huge transportation savings. In 2009, China accounted for 6% of our revenue. Our aim is to increase our sales to China by 50% to one-third of total sales in the long term. Meanwhile, we are taking advantage of areas where China does have a competitive advantage in manufacturing. For instance, we have two production facilities in China that supply our Siberian smelters with cathodes that are used in the electrolysis process that separates aluminum from alumina.

China has already demonstrated its strong will to balance the growth speed with quality and efficiency for a healthy national economy. The aluminum industry is but one example of how this might open surprising opportunities for China’s trading partners. In a matter of a decade we will see a completely different China. The question is who is going to be the first to leverage this change.

Rusal to increase alumina and aluminium production

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

The following article comes from Moscow Times.

United Company RusAl’s shares continued their rally on Tuesday, bringing their two-day gains to more than 10 percent, after the company said it planned to increase aluminium production this year.

RusAl’s stock closed at 8.3 Hong Kong dollars ($1.07), or 3.5 percent higher, adding to Monday’s gains of 6.9 percent for its biggest surge since trading started on Jan. 27. But the recovery was still not enough to recoup early losses for IPO investors, who remain down 14.1 percent.

In a statement released Monday, RusAl said it expected to increase aluminium production by 3 percent in 2010, compared with the previous year. The company also plans to increase alumina output by 7 percent this year.

Separately, RusAl said Friday that it had reached a long-term cooperation agreement with the new Guinean government, easing fears of continued disruptions of bauxite supplies from the impoverished West African state. The material is a key component in aluminium production.

“The trend of emerging from the global recession based on growing orders from our clients in Europe and the United States, as well as active economic growth in Asia, give rise to our optimism regarding the perspectives of the aluminium industry,” RusAl CEO and co-owner Oleg Deripaska said in the statement Monday. “We expect that the stabilization that’s appearing will be replaced by higher-than-anticipated growth of metals consumption relative to production.”

RusAl said its plans to increase output were also based on analysts’ positive 2010 outlook for the aluminium market, which would see a substantial growth.

“A number of experts are forecasting that 2010 will see considerable growth of the aluminium market generated by rising demand from the automotive and packaging sectors,” the statement said, adding that positive dynamics on the market would be driven by the demand from China and India, as well as from developed countries.

Aluminium prices crashed along with demand from industry in late 2008 and early 2009, falling to below $1,300 per metric ton in February 2009, from highs of more than $3,300 in July 2008. Three-month contracts on the London Metal Exchange closed at $2,151 on Tuesday.

There are reasons to believe that RusAl will achieve its production goal, said Nikolai Sosnovsky, a metals analyst at UralSib.

“The increase of 3 percent is not much. RusAl will probably manage to sell such a production volume. Prices are rising and many companies will return capacities. Since RusAl is one of the lowest-cost producers, I think it will manage to return more capacities than the others,” Sosnovsky told The Moscow Times.

RusAl also said its aluminium output dropped by 11 percent in 2009 and amounted to 3.9 million metric tons, compared with 4.4 million metric tons in 2008. Output of alumina – which is primarily used for aluminium production – totaled 7.3 million metric tons, declining by 36 percent from the figure of 11.3 million metric tons in 2008.

Bauxite production declined by 41 percent to 11.3 million metric tons, from 19.1 million a year earlier.

Sosnovsky said RusAl’s year-end production results did not come as a big surprise.

“According to all prognoses, production will exceed demand over the next several years. That’s why RusAl, like many other producers, was cutting output according to the plan,” he said.

RusAl had to cut production because of negative market factors last year, including a 35 percent drop in aluminium prices, the company said in the statement.

Deripaska said the company had become more competitive thanks to its program to cut expenses, a successful debt restructuring and the share listing in Hong Kong and Paris. RusAl reached agreement to cut its debt burden from $16.8 billion to $14.9 billion ahead of the IPO and subsequently used $2.14 billion from the listing to pay down its obligations further.

RusAl raised $2.24 billion in the IPO, selling its stock at 10.8 Hong Kong dollars per share ($1.39). The shares plunged, however, in their first day of trading and lost almost 30 percent of the offering price earlier this month.

On Friday, the company said it had signed an agreement with the Guinean government on establishing a joint commission to provide “a stable basis for long-term and mutually beneficial cooperation.”

The commission will start working by March 1, the statement said.

In January, the former mining minister of Guinea, which is the world’s biggest producer of bauxite, demanded part of the proceeds that RusAl had earned from its IPO, saying the company owed the Guinean government as much as $860 million in damages.

RusAl denied the claims, noting that the former minister, Mahmoud Thiam, no longer represented the government.

Thiam was part of the government of ousted military junta leader Moussa Dadis Camara, who left the country late last year for medical treatment after an assassination attempt. Camara’s government was replaced by the military junta last month.